From: Carol Abel [cabel@sfasu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 9:44 PM
To: 'Carolyn Abel'; hollierdr@sfasu.edu; lambertjm@sfasu.edu; sjosephsen@sfasu.edu; rjudy@sfasu.edu; sswearingen@sfasu.edu; ewittel@sfasu.edu
Cc: jjacobson@sfasu.edu; 'John Leonard'
Subject: TECH MTG CHANGED TO MARCH 31 - 1:30 - RM 118

I talked with the dean today. John Leonard joined us near the end of this meeting.

We have changed our plans somewhat so we cannot meet until NEXT FRIDAY at 1:30 in room 118.

 

In the interim, I will be modifying the survey to accommodate the COE strategic plan and the conceptual frameworks and I will be making it much more user-friendly. This Friday, Steve, Ed, and Robert will begin laying the foundation for our survey at this site: http://express.perseus.com/perseus/asp/login.aspx  You may wish to sign up and try out this user-friendly survey construction site for your own personal teaching needs.

 

In general, we decided:

 

1 – to create a separate page of the NCATE rept. We will call it: UNIT TECHNOLOGY REPORT

2 – this page will Summarize activity at the UNIT level, then the DEPARTMENT level, and include the SPA PROGRAM Technology reports (similar to our existing plans). Our survey results will also be integrated throughout and we are hoping to develop an aligned linked CHART(s) to facilitate a more graphic understanding about how and where technology is being used in the COE. We will include a section of what was discovered and what we plan to do about it and hopefully by the time the report is written, we may actually be acting on some of those recommendations. It was acknowledged that a technology committee will continue to play a key role for the COE beyond the NCATE visit.

3 – We will still need to divide up and INTERVIEW THE CHAIRS of the 6 STANDARDS COMMITTEES (and Leonard will alert them this Friday that we will be asking for a technology summary from them) PLUS the dean would like us to also interview the chairs of each DEPARTMENT. We can decide all of this at our meeting. These will be summary pieces and we will also include links to our survey where data adds to this information.

 

 

By the way, the chairs of the 6 standards committees are:

Standard 1 – Education Candidates (EC)…………C. Coleman

Standard 2 – Assessment Data …………………..M. Brunson

Standard 3 – Field…………………………………..N. Armstrong

Standard 4 – Diversity………………………..…….S. Cole

Standard 5 – Faculty……………………………….M. Finkenberg

Standard 6 – Resources……………………………L. Stewart

 

 

 

 

 

SOMETHING TO MUNCH ON TILL OUR NEXT MEETING:

____________________________________________________________

 

Sections remain basically the same:

http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/

http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/institutreport/index.htm

 

 

UNIT TECHNOLOGY REPORT

Analysis of Technology Implementation / Integration.......abel


UNIT REPORT

 

  Since our Last Accreditation Visit.............................abel


Summary Reports


  Standard 1 - Teacher Candidates..........................josephsen
  Standard 2 - Assessment Data.............................josephsen
  Standard 3 - Field Experiences............................hollier
  Standard 4 - Diversity (distance ed)..................... lambert
  Standard 5 - Faculty...........................................swearingen
  Standard 6 - Resources......................................wittel, judy

  Survey Data Collection.........................................wittel, judy, josephsen
  Survey Results (CHARTS)...................................abel, josephsen /input all
  Survey Recommendations....................................abel, josephsen /input all
  Selected Examples..............................................abel
  Links / other info..................................................abel

 

DEPARTMENT REPORTS

   (by department)

  Survey Analysis..................................................josephsen, abel
  Selected Examples
  Links / other info

 

 

 

PROGRAM REPORTS

  SPA Reports - Technology....................................abel (all sections)
  Survey Results
  Selected Examples
  Links / other info

 
Survey Analysis......................................................abel, josephsen
  
                                                                              (and all others)

                                              

CONCLUSIONS............................................................abel



 

 

_________________________________________

Here is the "minimum"
of what each MUST SHOW (or discuss as a need and take steps to fix it):


 

NCATE Sources - What is Acceptable
http://www.ncate.org/public/unitStandardsRubrics.asp?ch=4
http://www.ncate.org/public/faqStandards.asp?ch=4#faq4



STANDARD 1 - TEACHER CANDIDATES
Precise wording:  TC are "able" to use technology in teaching
Other school personnel = "use" technology in their practice
Add any pgm documentation = assessment data that demonstrates TC ability to use technology (E.G., teXes EXAM, required course or portfolio, etc.)

Note: our new TA TEKS requires teachers to be able to use tech at the level of what is expected for 8th graders and it will now be expected and tested (already embeded w/n our program as state requirements). I think this is (or will certainly become) our strongest
'evidence' that it will be taken care of. The new TEKS probably has it totally embedded (being approved now / talk about that collaborative process some).

CHAIR of committee: http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/standards/index.htm
Other contact: Dr. Wynter Chauvin

SURVEY SECTIONS to be added later: 

Example: NU: 1:3, Under Do You Prepare TC? / Do your TCs know how to integrate technology to teach content?)

We might report something like this:
___% of faculty in ____ dept report TCs know how to integrate technology to teach content (highest category checked).  From the comment section, ___% of these mentioned that they do not follow through on this, however.
___% of faculty in ____ dept report TCs  know "little" about how to integrate technology....



STANDARD 2 - ASSESSMT DATA
Precise wording:  Report of progress throughout COE / progress in maintaining the assessment system through the use of information technologies / regularly shared with candidates and faculty respectively to help them reflect on their performance and improve it.  Question to ask: Has technology been assessed? (will INTASC, NETS, and TA TEKS begin requiring this?)

The unit has designed, established, and maintained a structure and governance system for planning, delivering, and evaluating programs that includes school practitioners as well as faculty and administrators in other units of the institution. A key element of that system is the development and implementation of an assessment system that includes the gathering and use of candidate performance data, as described under Standard 2, to ensure that candidates meet standards.

CHAIR of committee: http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/standards/index.htm

SURVEY SECTIONS to be added later: 

Example: NU:2  and BOE:P / under Do You Prepare TC... 
We might report something like this:

  ___% of all faculty surveyed in all departments (73% responding) indicate their department "always" uses technology to monitor progress of TCs throughout the program. ____% of these indicated their department "always" used this information to improve their programs.




STANDARD 3 - FIELD
Precise wording: Clinical practice "allows candidates to use" information technology to support teaching and learning.
Clinical faculty provide regular and continuing support for student teachers and other interns through such processes as observation, conferencing, group discussion, email, and the use of other technology.
Clinical practice provides for candidates' use of information technology to support teaching, learning, and other professional responsibilities.
Expects that candidates have the "opportunity" in their field and clinical experiences to use technology to support teaching and learning.  We might get by on this one if we report the technology grants to get computers in schools, the modeling and teaching of technology in our classes, and the "encouragement" from mentors & supervisors and college classes to integrate technology during internship experiences.
We will add what is discovered via survey and possibly add that this one needs reved up a bit now that we are all begin'g to recognize the signifiance and ability to improve learning using technology in our teaching.

CHAIR of committee: http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/standards/index.htm

SURVEY SECTIONS to be added later:  

Example: BOER 3:B:3  / Do You Prepare TC? / Do you encourage TCs to integrate tech into teach'g in the field? which offers a percentage re dept, etc

It could either be incorporated into this report or added in this way:
___% of TC in_____ dept. are encoruaged by faculty to integrate technology into their field teachiing experience.
___% of TC in ____ dept.....




STANDARD 4 - DIVERSITY
Precise wording: adapt instruction and services appropriately for all students, including students with exceptionalities. They demonstrate dispositions that value fairness and learning by all students.
FAC DEMO ABILITY TO integrate diversity into teaching: http://www.ncate.org/public/faqStandards.asp?ch=4#faq4  
From the "ideal" list: faculty integrate diversity and technology throughout their teaching.

CHAIR of committee: http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/standards/index.htm
Other contact: Chuck Lopez


Part of this section can refer to the alternative student needing our Distance Ed Program

Forgot to clear this with the dean and Leonard.

CONTACT PERSON:  Dr. Randy McDonald
(also contact Dr. Melane Mcculler, and maybe Gail Weatherly & Randy Watson)
Ask them to submit a summary report to you of what they offer and short history behind it for our national accreditation.
Ask them specifically about DE: A, Q, and P which is the vision outlined here: http://www.oit.sfasu.edu/disted/facsup/strategicguidelines.html  


SURVEY SECTIONS to be added later:  e.g., V-P
Do you use tech to give personal attention & direction to students?
l00% of all COE faculty use technology to give personal attention & direction to students. This ranges from email to office hours in chat rooms (from comment section).

Most Diversity, like technology, is integrated across the survey 

Example: BOER:5:G:1 under Needs/Access
Is sufficient adaptive technology available to meet your needs? 

We might report something like this:
80% of faculty surveyed in all dept (73% responding) say they feel they have sufficient adaptive technology to meet their needs (top category, "much agree")



STANDARD 5 - FACULTY, both university and school-based (field)
As we learn ways to improve learning with tech, this effectiveness is expected to improve.
Precise wording: faculty "demonstrate the ability to" integrate technology into their teaching
Standard 5 also mandates that the unit "provides opportunities" for faculty to develop new knowledge and skills in areas including technology. Needs are assessed and opportunities for prof development based on these needs is provided.

CHAIR of committee: Finkenberg http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/standards/index.htm
OIT Contact: Melane McCuller

SURVEY SECTIONS to be added later: 

Example:  BOE-M  /under Integration into Teching / Do you integrate technology into your teaching?
We might report something like this:

 ____% of all field teachers surveyed (68% responding) report integrating technology into their teaching "a little" (scored 2 out of 4).  ___% indicated "none" of the time and ___% indicated they "always integrate tech into their teaching.




STANDARD 6 - RESOURCES
Precise wording: expects the unit to have adequate information technology resources to support faculty and candidates. 
NCATE Standard 6 requires that the teacher preparation unit provides adequate campus and school facilities to support candidates in meeting standards. http://www.ncate.org/public/faqStandards.asp?ch=4#faq4   

Acceptable
Sufficient resources, including information technology resources, are necessary to offer all of the programs at the institution that prepare educators to work in schools, including the delivery of high-quality field experiences and clinical practice.
The unit receives sufficient budgetary allocations at least proportional to other units on campus or similar units at other campuses to provide programs that prepare candidates to meet standards. The budget adequately supports on-campus and clinical work essential for preparation of professional educators.
The unit provides an adequate number of support personnel so that programs can prepare candidates to meet standards. The unit provides adequate resources and opportunities for professional development of faculty, including training in the use of technology.
The unit has adequate campus and school facilities, as well as, electronic support to support candidates in meeting standards. The facilities support faculty and candidate's use of information technology in instruction.
The COE provides adequate resources to develop and implement the unit's assessment plan.
Faculty and candidates have access both to sufficient and current library and curricular resources and electronic information.

Standard 6 expects the unit (COE) to have the budget, personnel and facilities, including information technology resources to prepare candidates to meet professional, state and institutional standards. The rubrics expect that the budget allocations are at least proportional to other units on campus, that there are sufficient numbers of full-time faculty and support personnel to support programs, that faculty workloads allow faculty to be effectively engaged in teaching, scholarship, and service. It is also expected that facilities support the use of information technology by candidates and faculty, and that faculty and candidates have access to current and sufficient curricular and library resources and electronic information. http://www.ncate.org/public/faqStandards.asp?ch=4#faq4

2 parts to your report - STANDARD 6 SUMMARY and OTHER DISCOVERIES
It will be your job to get the summary of information from the chair for this section of our report and for you to add in a separate section for anything pertinent you discover on your own and/or your thoughts about what you found.   Please keep these two sections of your standard 6 report separate for now. We may combine them later
.

 

CHAIR of committee: http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ncate/standards/index.htm

Other contact:  Dr. Wynter Chauvin
You might want to travel to the "field" sites and check into Teacher Candidate and Mentor Teacher ACCESS to technology plus NEEDS expressed. A survey and possible grants might be suggested as possible sollutions if found to be inadequate.

SURVEY SECTIONS to be added later: 

Example: NU:6:5; BOER:5:G;1
Under: Other Re Technology:  "Do you feel you have sufficient access to electronic library....

We might report something like this:
90% of the faculty (78% responding) said they have "some" (yes, some, little, no) access to an electronic library & curricular resouces.