EMAILED TO:
jjohnston@sfasu.edu
bcarr@sfasu.edu
lfwhite@sfasu.edu
austinnorju@sfasu.edu
jlowry@sfasu.edu
rclaunch@sfasu.edu
tdavis@sfasu.edu
kstahl@sfasu.edu
rdarville@sfasu.edu
adoyleanderson@sfasu.edu
jstandley@sfasu.edu
Hello.
If you are a recipient of this email, it is because your email address appeared
at some juncture as part of an ongoing dialogue regarding my request for
information about the integration of technology into your teaching.
Please, first let me apologize for alarming any of you. I had asked my grad
assistant who is completely reliable and professional to contact you for
this information but I neglected to take the time necessary to more clearly
communicate my needs to her. I am here to better explain my request.
The College of Education (COE) is nearing the final stages of completing
its report to maintain national certification with NCATE (much like the dreaded
SAKS). I am chair of the technology committee. Our mission is to demonstrate
the commitment to, and integration of, technology into our university teaching
which is then expected to impact the kinds of teacher candidates we prepare--ultimately
impacting K-12 public school classrooms. This is a huge and rather
elusive task; in fact, NCATE is not sure how to direct us on this even though
it expects us to address it well.
On several occasions I reported our needs at various meetings in the COE
and to the Steering Committee and I am sorry if I inadvertently assumed some
of you had been present. Regardless, my request is really a simple one for
you. I do not need a "report" as such, rather a simple narrative or
summary--whatever you can provide (email is fine)--that would help me begin
to explore the integration of technology as it relates to our teacher Ed
program and any influence you may have on this. I have narrowed it down to
4 main areas so it would be helpful if you would categorize any responses
you may have for me according to the following:
I am looking for ANY "evidence" of
-a COMMITMENT to technology
-any INTEGRATION of TECHNOLOGY (STRENGTHS) into college teaching (of our
teacher candidates)
-any perceived WEAKNESSES in the area of technology that you have discovered
or are discovering
-any PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENT along these lines
Your report does not need to be comprehensive nor complete; whatever comes
to your mind probably best represents where you are right now with technology
anyway. That simple narrative would be helpful to us. As you continue
to consider my request, you may notice more "evidence" which I would be glad
to receive as you uncover it. Our NCATE board does not expect us to
have fully integrated technology across the entire university but they DO
EXPECT us to have begun the "process" of taking an 'accountable' and "responsible"
look at where we are and where we are going with respect to integrating technology
into our teaching which in turn, as I mentioned, is expected to impact the
kind of "effective" teaching our teacher candidates do in the public school
classroom.
Thank you for whatever you can provide and please keep me in mind when changes
in this status occur.
Carol Abel
Chair, NCATE Technology Committee
http://www.education.sfasu.edu/ele/classes/abel/ncate_technology.html